This story passes for "Health News" in mainstream UK newspap

Our national media, academia and courts are biased. Talk about it here!

This story passes for "Health News" in mainstream UK newspap

Postby Bill Whatcott » Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:19 pm

Health News
Case study: 'My son was six when he first demanded a sex change'
Nicki was born a boy but as early as 18-months-old, she was already trying on her mother's dresses and underwear.

By Richard Alleyne, Science Correspondent
15 Apr 2011
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healt ... hange.html

At nursery, she shunned boys' games and preferred to play with the girls.

By four, Nicki was telling her mother Sharon, an IT manager, that "God made a mistake by making me a boy".

Two years later, she was already asking for a sex change operation.

It was at this point that Sharon, now 42, decided to attend the Gender Identity Development (GID) service at the Tavistock and Portman mental health trust in North London.

Shortly after, Sharon also decided it was time to allow Nicki to attend primary school in female clothes.

"By this time, Nicki was telling everyone she had a girl brain in a boy body," said Sharon.

"She got quite a lot of stick because she was going to school as a boy and saying she was a girl.

"So, at eight, we made the decision not to let her do that.

"I let her grow her hair and she got a blouse and a skirt. She didn't have to wear boys' clothes at all anymore.

"As soon as I did that she was so much happier and the other kids understood it because she looked like a girl now."

But matters took a turn for the worse when Nicki moved on to secondary school, where she became suicidal because of bullying.

"She took four overdoses," said Sharon, from Yorkshire.

"For a year and a half she was spat at, kicked, punched, pushed over.

"One day, when she was walking home from school a group of boys surrounded her and tried to pull her skirt down."

"When she first got to the school, one boy announced 'So where is the tranny?' It was awful."

With the abuse expected to get worse as Nicki got closer to puberty, her mother began to look into the possibility of her daughter being prescribed hormone blockers.

She went back to the Tavistock clinic but was told they were unable to prescribe the treatment because it was against their guidelines to do any interventions before 16.

Fearing that her daughter may take her own life if forced to go through puberty, she went to an American expert Dr Norman Spack in Boston.

To her relief, Dr Spack, who runs a Gender Identity Disorder clinic in Boston, agreed to prescribe the 13-year-old Nicki the blockers.

Now 17, she has had a sex change operation and works as a care assistant.

"She holds down a full time and has been with her boyfriend for 18 months and she is gorgeous," said Sharon.

"I am absolutely positive she would not be here without the treatment."

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is the response I posted in the Daily Telegraph's "comments" section. I hope the moderator does not censor it, as I do believe I make well thought out, if not irrefutable, arguments against what is truly propaganda:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is called "Health News?" It looks more like, highly specious, pro-homosexual propaganda to me. First off if Nicki has a "boyfriend," both of them are committing homosexuality, as Nicki was born a boy and no amount of surgery and hormones will ever alter this fact.

Second of all, this story is way too rosy for me to accept unequivocally. I worked with many transsexual patients over the years, pre-op and post-op. In all my career, I have never seen such a rosy story as this. Most transsexuals subjectively claim they are happy with their surgery, but the same psychological problems plaguing the transsexual subculture persist after the surgery, as before: promiscuity, drug abuse, violence, high risk STDs and HIV, suicide, etc.....

A few of the biological men and women who mutilate themselves and declare themselves the gender they are not, later on regret their surgery and want to undo the damage done to them by this quack medicine.

Here is the testimony of one "Gender Identity Expert" who I wish the media would give more coverage to, if only to add balance to what I believe is complete nonsense, emanating from stories such as this:


"I have witnessed a great deal of damage from sex-reassignment. The children transformed from their male constitution into female roles suffered prolonged distress and misery as they sensed their natural attitudes. Their parents usually lived with guilt over their decisions—second-guessing themselves and somewhat ashamed of the fabrication, both surgical and social, they had imposed on their sons. As for the adults who came to us claiming to have discovered their “true” sexual identity and to have heard about sex-change operations, we psychiatrists have been distracted from studying the causes and natures of their mental misdirections by preparing them for surgery and for a life in the other sex. We have wasted scientific and technical resources and damaged our professional credibility by collaborating with madness rather than trying to study, cure, and ultimately prevent it."
Paul McHugh, MD, Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University


Bill Whatcott

P.s: What 6 year old would be demanding a so-called "sex change operation," if his parents or educators were not putting that kind of nonsense in his poor little mind? :timeout:
User avatar
Bill Whatcott
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 5551
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 6:33 pm
Location: Edmonton, AB

Re: This story passes for "Health News" in mainstream UK new

Postby Bill Whatcott » Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:58 pm

So far the Daily Telegraph is allowing the debate to proceed:

Here is a response to my initial response and my rebuttal:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gharrison14
1 hour ago

'Pro-homosexual'?
I hate to break the news to you but male homosexuals are, on the whole, rather fond of penises, their own included, and aren't hurrying to have them removed.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Bill Whatcott
0 minutes ago

Dear gharrison14

I agree with you. I worked in Homecare, in Toronto's homosexual district for about 6 years and I am well aware of the distinctions between transsgenderism and "typical" male homosexuality.

However, I am sure you would have to agree with me the "political" movement that promotes the acceptance of homosexuality, generally embraces the political goals of transsgenderism as well. It is not a mistake transgenders are always well represented at "gay pride" parades around the world, nor is it a coincidence the homosexual activist wing of Britain's Labour party is named, "LGBT Labour."

I should also note 100% of my male transvestite patients who declared themselves women, frequented "gay" bars and engaged in homosexual sex with other men.

My understanding of genetics, human biology, not to mention 5000 years of consistent Judeau/Christian teaching that God has only made two unchangeable genders, absolutely prevents me from calling sex between a post operative transsexual male and another male, "heterosexual sex."

The "vagina" created by a surgeon is not a real vagina in any sense of the word. There is no vaginal fluid created during sex and abrasions, lack of elasticity, and lack of natural lubrication, means in my experience most post op transsexuals opt for receptive anal sex (very high risk for HIV, amongst other diseases), rather than the pseudo-vaginal experience, doctors try to create for them. In fact all of the post op patients, I have knowledge of, had to use medically prescribed dildo devices, to keep their pseudo vaginal opening open. If they did not lubricate and penetrate themselves on a regular basis their medically created pseudo-vaginal canal would permanently disappear.

This surgery has a high risk of being botched and the psychological and physical consequences of a botching, not to mention the permanent scarring and genital mutilation resulting from a botching, should make any thoughtful person working in the medical field concerned about the ethical implications of involving themselves in this sort of pseudo medicine. I agree with Dr. Paul McHugh, this type of pseudo medicine is harmful to patients who request it, is harmful to taxpayers who fund it, and is harmful to the medical profession which discredits its self when it covers up the real harm that these procedures cause. Contrary to this article, there is zilch, zero, nada, evidence; beyond subjective testimonies, this mutilation improves the quality of life of men, women and children, who undergo these permanently mutilating procedures.

I don't know a single heterosexual man who wishes to have any form of sex with a post operative transsexual, the reason being, that in-spite of all the brainwashing we have received from LGBT activists operating in our public education and media establishments, we all know deep down inside that no doctor can really take a man and turn him into a woman.
User avatar
Bill Whatcott
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 5551
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 6:33 pm
Location: Edmonton, AB

Re: This story passes for "Health News" in mainstream UK new

Postby Bill Whatcott » Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:07 pm

No big surprise. The so-called "conservative" Daily Telegraph deleted my initial comment questioning the validity of their "News" and "sex change" operations in general. There is a whack of other deleted comments too, on their pseudo discussion thread. I don't believe any pro-transgender comments are deleted, just anti transgender ones. I doubt I broke any posting guideline. You can see my deleted comment on this thread and judge the content for yourself. The "news" in this story is not news, it is propaganda and the comments being deleted are not malicious, slander, or off topic; they are postings which undermine the propaganda. The Daily Mail and most big news organizations can't tolerate serious debate that challenges homosexuality and transgenderism.
User avatar
Bill Whatcott
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 5551
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 6:33 pm
Location: Edmonton, AB


Return to Left Wing Bias

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron